Funds and asset tracing. It follows money out of the documented record and names where it went, from transaction data alone.
That narrow input is the point. Tracer needs bank and card statements and nothing else: no tax returns, no full discovery production, no questionnaire.
Where a complete document set exists you have other options. Where all you have is a run of statements, this still answers the question.
Nineteen rows of "$4,000 to a brokerage" is a spreadsheet. "$76,400 to an account we have never seen, monthly for nineteen months" is a sentence. Outflows are grouped by destination and reported with a total, a transaction count, a cadence, and a date range.
| Destination | Total out | Txns | Cadence | Venue | Disclosed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COINBASE | $76,400 | 19 | monthly, 19 months | crypto (0.95) | no |
| TRANSFER TO ACCT *4417 | $41,250 | 11 | intermittent, 14 months | unidentified | no |
| ZELLE TO R. HALVERSON | $18,600 | 31 | more than monthly | unidentified | no |
| PINNACLE TRUST | $12,300 | 4 | intermittent, 6 months | brokerage (0.50, confirm) | no |
Rows from the sample trace. Every row also carries the underlying transaction IDs, the average transaction, first and last seen dates, and the last four digits where the statement showed them.
An account that appears only as the destination of a transfer gets a record of its own, flagged as undisclosed. That is how "something is missing" becomes a claim rather than a hunch.
Where the destination identifies itself, it is named: a crypto exchange, a brokerage, a retirement account with no statement in the file. Where it does not, the row says unidentified rather than guessing.
A venue identified at 0.95 and one identified at 0.50 are not the same claim. The weaker one is flagged for confirmation instead of being asserted, so nothing in the output needs to be taken on faith.
Tracer reports where money went according to the statements provided. It does not conclude that a transfer was improper, and an undisclosed destination is a documentation gap rather than a finding of concealment. The most common explanation for an account nobody can account for is an account nobody thought to produce.
The output is a data file, not a written analysis. That is deliberate: it is built to be worked with, sorted, and cited, and to sit underneath an opinion written by the professional on the matter.
$350 is a flat fee for a matter of ordinary size. An unusually large statement set is quoted per page instead, and the page count is shown and confirmed before any extraction is charged.
A matter you need read, a production you need inventoried, or a practice that wants to run these tools under its own name.
Book a Call